Overwatch 2’s collaboration with the manga One-Punch Man drew largely constructive suggestions this month. With its success, the sport’s developer introduced at the moment that not solely are they contemplating extra potential collaborations, however there could already be one other one within the works.
In a blog post, the sport’s director Aaron Keller famous that Blizzard was “just a little nervous” about how its energetic collaboration would go, however now that it’s gone properly, gamers can anticipate to see one other on the horizon.
“Once we first introduced the collab, we talked about our values with how we’d prefer to deal with occasions like these, and gamers appeared to agree with us,” he mentioned. “The recognition of the occasion has given us the boldness to do extra collaborations, and we’re hoping to premiere one other giant collab later this yr.”
Associated: How to unlock all free Overwatch 2 One-Punch Man Cosmetics
In revealing their unique collab with One-Punch Man, Keller famous that the group wished to make it possible for hero skins allowed characters to take care of their Overwatch id, though they’d be, no less than partly, depicting a personality from a distinct IP.
Whereas Keller didn’t point out precisely what model they’d be collaborating with, it’s clear that they wish to do extra collaborative occasions transferring ahead, and followers have already been theorizing varied artistic collaborations may very well be on the horizon.
The present One-Punch Man collaboration contains three purchasable bundles which have Legendary skins for heroes depicting them as a number of the hottest characters within the One-Punch Man universe. Moreover, Blizzard let gamers play to earn one pores and skin just by queuing up sufficient video games.
It’s unclear if one other collaboration can be as closely skewed towards having purchasable skins as a substitute of free and/or earnable ones, however given the sport’s transfer to free-to-play, one would anticipate store skins to be a staple of future collabs as properly.
Source link
